On access
for everyone.

Our commitment.

MATRIX is committed to ensuring that this website and the studio's published materials are accessible to the widest possible audience — regardless of ability, technology, or circumstance.

We hold that accessibility is not a compliance exercise. It is part of what it means to design trustworthy intelligence systems. An interface that excludes some of its users is an interface that has not finished its work.

Standards we follow.

We aim to conform to the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2, Level AA — the internationally recognised standard published by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C).

Where a content type or interaction is not fully covered by WCAG 2.2 AA, we look to EN 301 549 (the European accessibility standard for ICT) and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities for additional guidance.

Where local regulation applies — including the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 (India) and the Guidelines for Indian Government Websites (GIGW) — we take account of those obligations in the design of our public materials.

Accessibility principles.

The following design principles are held across the studio's public materials. They apply to this website, the manifesto, research publications, and portfolio documents.

Current status.

An honest record. Where a feature is fully supported, it is marked pass. Where support is partial, it is marked partial. Where work is ongoing, it is marked in progress.

This statement reflects the status of the studio's public website as of the effective date. The status is reviewed annually and updated when material changes occur.

How we test.

Accessibility is not self-declared. It is verified. Our testing combines automated tooling, manual review, and — where possible — engagement with users of assistive technology.

Known limitations.

We publish our limitations plainly. Where we know a barrier exists, we say so — and we say what we are doing about it.

Feedback & contact.

If you encounter an accessibility barrier on this website, in a publication, or in any MATRIX material — we want to hear from you. Feedback from users is treated as primary evidence, and we will respond plainly.

Where you are not satisfied with our response, you may escalate the matter to the Founder directly via [email protected]. We treat accessibility complaints with the same seriousness as any other formal concern.

Enforcement & remedies.

Where we fail to meet the standards set out in this statement, we will:

• ◆ Acknowledge the failure plainly, and not dismiss it as an edge case.
• ◆ Provide a reasonable interim alternative — an accessible version of the content, or a direct human channel.
• ◆ Correct the underlying issue in the next review cycle, or sooner where the impact is material.
• ◆ Record the issue and the remedy in our internal accessibility register.

Where a specific legal obligation applies to your jurisdiction — including the Indian Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, the European Accessibility Act, or the US ADA — we take those obligations seriously and address them within the timeline required.

A final word.

The real revolution is the evolution of consciousness. Access is a form of consciousness in practice.

An intelligence architecture firm cannot claim to design for civilisation and then exclude part of it. This statement is a commitment — not a claim of perfection. Where we have not yet reached the standard we set ourselves, we have said so. Where we fall short in future, we will say so again.

If you have read this far and something still doesn't work, write to us. That is the whole point.